Do you speak Cataloguish? Even in Libraryland, not everyone does. I’m far from fluent myself, but I do have an
MLIS degree, and I can speak it a little.
When questions about MARC records and cataloging practices come up at
Playaway, they usually find their way to me.
At the time, we at Playaway were overjoyed
that our preloaded player had become a significant enough part of the library
landscape to warrant serious cataloging attention. Since then, however, it’s become clear that
one of the group’s recommendations is causing confusion for library staff and
patrons.
By the slimmest of margins, the task group
decided to recommend that the GMD or “General Materials Designation” (the MARC
245 field, sub-field “h”) for audiobooks on Playaway should be “electronic
resource” rather than “non-musical sound recording” (NSR). Although I’ve talked to people who understand
the reasoning that went into the decision, sooner or later, everyone I’ve
spoken with admits that the decision doesn’t pass the common-sense test.
The problem, it seems, was that the task
group consisted entirely of academic librarians, most of whom were not attuned
to the world of audiobooks in public libraries.
Rather than thinking in terms of Playaway as a physical audio format
that patrons and staff equate with other physical formats such as CD and
cassette, the task group seems to have been trying to look ahead to the next
generation of cataloguing standards, RDA – the supposed successor to AACR2, the
Anglo-American Cataloging Rules.
RDA – now there’s a complicated dialect of
Cataloguish that I don’t speak very well, but then very few people do. RDA is a much-delayed, much-debated
standards framework that seeks to overcome the limitations of current MARC
standards as embodied in AACR2. But the
earliest date at which anyone anticipates adoption of the standards to begin is late in 2010.
In the meantime – and probably for a long
time after 2010 – the problem with the GMD decision is significant.
Playaways are most often found in public
libraries. Public library patrons and
staff (not all of whom are trained cataloguers by any means) are accustomed to
seeing audiobooks on cassette and CD listed as non-musical sound
recordings. In fact, many Online Public
Access Catalogs (OPACs) display a special symbol that distinguishes audiobooks
from their printed counterparts based on the NSR designation. Downloadable audiobooks usually show up as
electronic resources and may have a different symbol.
Take a look at this screenshot
from
the OPAC of the Rocky River, Ohio Public Library (they use Sirsi/Dynix’s
iBistro software). The first title in
the list is actually on Playaway, but looking at it in this view, all that’s
indicated is that it’s an electronic resource.
If you were a patron trying to get a copy of The Age of Innocence on a physical format, would this tell you
enough to make you put a hold on this item, or would you assume it was a
downloadable title and keep looking?
Playaway’s MARC records are produced to the
highest standard, and naturally enough, we chose to follow the OLAC guidelines
in full. Under the guidelines, libraries
can of course make whatever local changes to the record they like. So for those libraries that prefer to use
NSR, Playaway can make that change to the records we provide.
But we’re getting so many questions and
complaints on this issue, that I’m beginning to think that the DEFAULT for our
records should be NSR.
The bigger problem, however, is that
currently only a minority of Playaway library customers get their records
straight from us. Far more get them from OCLC. These
are the same records (created by Playaway and uploaded to OCLC as a “contributing
vendor”), but as a matter of policy, OCLC expects us to fully follow the OLAC
guidelines.
Yes, local libraries can make whatever
changes they see fit, but not every library has the staff resources or
expertise to make this happen. And yes
there are other entries in other fields in the record that ndicate that a Playaway title is a
non-musical recording, but again libraries often lack the expertise necessary
to make custom changes to the way MARC fields are mapped to their OPAC listings.
As I see it, either OLAC needs to change
the guidelines or OCLC needs to be convinced to accept our records with the NSR
designation.
At ALA Midwinter, I met with task group
chair Heidi Frank of NYU and task group member Bill Anderson of the University
of Connecticut at Storrs. From talking
with them, it’s clear to me that everyone on the group had the best of
intentions, but in retrospect they may have made the wrong decision. Like all good catalogers, the members of the
Task Group aren’t interested in imposing rules that don’t work. Heidi and Bill heard me out most respectfully,
and they even agreed to re-open the issue with CAPC. This could however be a lengthy process. In the meantime Playaway will offer our
library customers the ability to customize GMD to meet their needs (at no cost),
and I will be investigating the possibility of submitting records to OCLC with
the NSR rather than the “electronic resource” designation.
I’m very interested in hearing your
thoughts on this. Please feel free to
post a comment here.
